gc_lover
06-22 12:30 PM
should this be in color or B/W ?
B/W would do it.
B/W would do it.
wallpaper Buying valentines day gifts for oyfriend
clarify21
11-25 03:29 PM
Hello everyone,
I have an H1-B from my current employer and my green card is in process. I have received my EAD.
I would like to work parttime at a different place while working fulltime with my current employer. There are soooo... many forums which talk about not using EAD with H1-B since this will cause the H1-B void.
Is there a USCIS source where we can get a clarification of using EAD with H1B? Looking forward to your replies.
Thanks!
I have an H1-B from my current employer and my green card is in process. I have received my EAD.
I would like to work parttime at a different place while working fulltime with my current employer. There are soooo... many forums which talk about not using EAD with H1-B since this will cause the H1-B void.
Is there a USCIS source where we can get a clarification of using EAD with H1B? Looking forward to your replies.
Thanks!
acecupid
03-13 01:58 PM
Hi to all,
I met with a potential client who is an illegal immigrant living in the US. She has a child who is a US citizen. The father was voluntarily deported and the mother gave him permission to take the child back to their home country to visit the grandparents. The father was supposed to make sure the child returned to the US within 3 months. It has been 6 months. If my client files an application under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, will the US Government begin deportation proceedings?
Have you read the 'About Us' section on ImmigrationVoice ? This forum is not for helping illegal immigrants. It is meant for legal immigrants and their issues.
I met with a potential client who is an illegal immigrant living in the US. She has a child who is a US citizen. The father was voluntarily deported and the mother gave him permission to take the child back to their home country to visit the grandparents. The father was supposed to make sure the child returned to the US within 3 months. It has been 6 months. If my client files an application under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, will the US Government begin deportation proceedings?
Have you read the 'About Us' section on ImmigrationVoice ? This forum is not for helping illegal immigrants. It is meant for legal immigrants and their issues.
2011 on Valentine#39;s Day 2007.
aioros
06-14 09:05 PM
oh but that's half the point! i don't wanna hide it, i wanna expose it! :)
more...
h1bdude1
03-26 11:10 AM
Do i also need chest X-Ray Report to submit with I-693 ??
Just check if the physician fills out the I-693 form without errors and signs it appropriately.
Just check if the physician fills out the I-693 form without errors and signs it appropriately.
ya3
04-09 07:41 PM
lol... didn't turn out how I expected it to, but anyhow:
more...
arsh007
06-18 05:41 PM
Hi
I am going to apply for i-485,
i have birth certificate which is taken in 2005 but I was born in 1974
some of my friends are saying...as you are born in 1974 and as your
birth certificate was taken in yr 2005, it might cause problems (ins poseses query)
to get the green card.
Is it right?
They are saying me to get Affidivits + non availability certificate now.
will it be a problem if I put my birth certificate....while applying for 485
thanks
Elephant
Your friends are correct. U can avoid RFE in I-485 by using affidavits.
I am going to apply for i-485,
i have birth certificate which is taken in 2005 but I was born in 1974
some of my friends are saying...as you are born in 1974 and as your
birth certificate was taken in yr 2005, it might cause problems (ins poseses query)
to get the green card.
Is it right?
They are saying me to get Affidivits + non availability certificate now.
will it be a problem if I put my birth certificate....while applying for 485
thanks
Elephant
Your friends are correct. U can avoid RFE in I-485 by using affidavits.
2010 est valentines gifts for
Carol
03-09 01:00 PM
I need to file for my tax refund now, but my employer is not sending me my W-2.
I used to work in US for 3 months under a program called Work and Travel. My employer is supposed to send me my W-2 now, but they haven't. When i checked with them, they told me as they never received my social security, a W-2 was never issued under my name. But the fact is that, they sent me an email last August telling me that they sent out my social security card on 23/07/2008. However the problem is that as they did not note down the correct address, the mail was lost (Anyway i am going to the US Embassy in my country to retrieve it). So i think they were cheating.
When i told my manager about this email, she explained saying that it was not about the social security. She said the W-2 was sent to them after i had left US, so while they never had it when my checks were issued. So it was never sent to their corporate as i am no longer working for them. And i think they are cheating me again.
I do not really understand how this works. Is her explanation reasonable?
What shall i do for my tax refund now?
I used to work in US for 3 months under a program called Work and Travel. My employer is supposed to send me my W-2 now, but they haven't. When i checked with them, they told me as they never received my social security, a W-2 was never issued under my name. But the fact is that, they sent me an email last August telling me that they sent out my social security card on 23/07/2008. However the problem is that as they did not note down the correct address, the mail was lost (Anyway i am going to the US Embassy in my country to retrieve it). So i think they were cheating.
When i told my manager about this email, she explained saying that it was not about the social security. She said the W-2 was sent to them after i had left US, so while they never had it when my checks were issued. So it was never sent to their corporate as i am no longer working for them. And i think they are cheating me again.
I do not really understand how this works. Is her explanation reasonable?
What shall i do for my tax refund now?
more...
techbuyer77
06-19 12:28 PM
I guess it gives you an idea how efficiently they work
hair Valentine#39;s Day is a day of
Blog Feeds
04-20 10:20 AM
Sad for a guy who used to be the voice of reason on immigration.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/mccain-praises-arizona-bill.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/mccain-praises-arizona-bill.html)
more...
sailor24
01-09 12:05 PM
hi everyone,
great info.
finally i was able to file my petition as spouse of us citizen. 1400 $!!!
this is my second time filing papers since 2004. we got denied for no show in interview.
we been 5 years married and goiing strong.
i read for one week instructions and self filed it.
im applicant of adjust status +i131 under spouse of citizen.
after self filed the papers, they are asking for initial evidence for i-485, wi thout that they cannot give me work permit.
.i put on support avidavit last year our joint 1040 with 10000 $ .it is not enough so we got joint sponsor, our friend, single with 40000$ at 1040.
i put my self as household member earning 90%. of 10000$. bad year. my wife could not work for long time.
the trouble is that income of mine with w2, was expired work permit.
dont ask me how because i dont know what happened i guess i forgot.:mad:
i know how stupid of me!!
they are asking for initial evidence of I - 485, to accept my income as household memeber, which as far as i understand to justify my earnings.
so i guess im big trouble showing that i worked without authorization.
please i need heads up.:confused:
im meeting several lawyers on monday, some of them with consult fee!!
what are my options????
any gooood immigration lawyer in tampa, florida.
please help!!
great info.
finally i was able to file my petition as spouse of us citizen. 1400 $!!!
this is my second time filing papers since 2004. we got denied for no show in interview.
we been 5 years married and goiing strong.
i read for one week instructions and self filed it.
im applicant of adjust status +i131 under spouse of citizen.
after self filed the papers, they are asking for initial evidence for i-485, wi thout that they cannot give me work permit.
.i put on support avidavit last year our joint 1040 with 10000 $ .it is not enough so we got joint sponsor, our friend, single with 40000$ at 1040.
i put my self as household member earning 90%. of 10000$. bad year. my wife could not work for long time.
the trouble is that income of mine with w2, was expired work permit.
dont ask me how because i dont know what happened i guess i forgot.:mad:
i know how stupid of me!!
they are asking for initial evidence of I - 485, to accept my income as household memeber, which as far as i understand to justify my earnings.
so i guess im big trouble showing that i worked without authorization.
please i need heads up.:confused:
im meeting several lawyers on monday, some of them with consult fee!!
what are my options????
any gooood immigration lawyer in tampa, florida.
please help!!
hot 5 Gifts Your Boyfriend DOESN#39;T
vegaspd
05-19 04:06 AM
Hi
first labor approved in may 2006 under EB3
140 was approved in 2007
Since I already had masters before I joined the company
EB2 labor applied and received approval in Jan 2011
My attorney applied for 140 porting but received priority date as Jan 2011 instead of may 2006. My attorney says immigrations has made a mistake, attorney contacted them and received a reference number basically asking attorney to call back on Jun 1st. I'm concerned on what went wrong and what could be the worst case scenario. How much time are talking about here.
Any information will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
first labor approved in may 2006 under EB3
140 was approved in 2007
Since I already had masters before I joined the company
EB2 labor applied and received approval in Jan 2011
My attorney applied for 140 porting but received priority date as Jan 2011 instead of may 2006. My attorney says immigrations has made a mistake, attorney contacted them and received a reference number basically asking attorney to call back on Jun 1st. I'm concerned on what went wrong and what could be the worst case scenario. How much time are talking about here.
Any information will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
more...
house Top Valentine#39;s Day Gifts
wandmaker
08-25 01:19 PM
Hi,
I have my I140 approved couple of years ago and now our company is being acquired by another firm. As a result I may lose my job. I am on 5th year of H1 and have I140 copy.
I got an offer with a project from a top consulting firm who is willing to transfer my H1 and also carry forward GC.
However I am concerned, as that consulting firm has the history of cancelling the H1 once they could not find any new projects after the current project. But in current market scenario, I could find any other opportunity and it may be necessary to join that firm.
So lets say after one/two years, if I lose my job with that firm and want to carry forward my H1/GC with other company, will it be possible?
What should I ask the firm now (terms and conditions, before start working with them) to make my self in safe position later on?
Thanks for your advice.
WA
PD on your profile does not sound realistic, whats your actual PD? I assume you have not filed your 485 according to your profile. This may help throw some opinions.
I have my I140 approved couple of years ago and now our company is being acquired by another firm. As a result I may lose my job. I am on 5th year of H1 and have I140 copy.
I got an offer with a project from a top consulting firm who is willing to transfer my H1 and also carry forward GC.
However I am concerned, as that consulting firm has the history of cancelling the H1 once they could not find any new projects after the current project. But in current market scenario, I could find any other opportunity and it may be necessary to join that firm.
So lets say after one/two years, if I lose my job with that firm and want to carry forward my H1/GC with other company, will it be possible?
What should I ask the firm now (terms and conditions, before start working with them) to make my self in safe position later on?
Thanks for your advice.
WA
PD on your profile does not sound realistic, whats your actual PD? I assume you have not filed your 485 according to your profile. This may help throw some opinions.
tattoo Good+valentine+gifts+for+
somegchuh
04-04 05:24 PM
I think this thread is really good start. I think the inherent problem is not the fact that H1B is temporary and ppl want GC. Basic problem is ppl want the right to be able to work for who they want and they want the same for their spouses. This can be addressed by H1B reform also. But I think it will be an uphill battle because most businesses get captive employees by way of H1B visa and would be the real losers in case of a reform.
more...
pictures Valentines Day.
mundakamal
06-13 07:49 PM
Hi All,
My employer after too much of talks is ready to file. But in all the applications he wants to put his address so that he receives the EAD card and AP..He is not ready to put my address. Can he keep my EAD card ?
Gurus please advise...
Thanks!
My employer after too much of talks is ready to file. But in all the applications he wants to put his address so that he receives the EAD card and AP..He is not ready to put my address. Can he keep my EAD card ?
Gurus please advise...
Thanks!
dresses Valentine#39;s Day Gifts for Him
GC08
05-26 06:30 AM
With so many proposals and so many amendments to the so many proposals (:rolleyes: ), which one would actually (or at least help to) eliminate the current backlogs (i.e., make the priority date current)? :confused:
We should make sure that any bill that potentially becomes a law will resolve the current retrogression issue (instead of making it worse).
So before we decide the bill to support, can anyone tell which bill will eliminate retrogression? Maybe we can categorize all the bills into the following types:
1. Will definitely eliminate retrogression if the bill becomes law
2. May eliminate retrogression or may make it worse if the bill becomes law
3. Will definitely make retrogression worse if the bill becomes law
4. Will have no impact on retrogression if the bill becomes law
:D
We should make sure that any bill that potentially becomes a law will resolve the current retrogression issue (instead of making it worse).
So before we decide the bill to support, can anyone tell which bill will eliminate retrogression? Maybe we can categorize all the bills into the following types:
1. Will definitely eliminate retrogression if the bill becomes law
2. May eliminate retrogression or may make it worse if the bill becomes law
3. Will definitely make retrogression worse if the bill becomes law
4. Will have no impact on retrogression if the bill becomes law
:D
more...
makeup quot;valentines day gift
sledge_hammer
08-07 02:50 PM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/6934653.stm
Pop star Lily Allen has had her US work visa cancelled after arriving at Los Angeles International Airport.
The 22-year-old, who is due to tour America in September, had flown in for the MTV Video Music Awards launch.
A spokesman for the singer said: "She's still in America. All her commitments will carry on as normal. The work visa will be sorted out by her next visit."
She was held at the airport for five hours in connection with an arrest for an alleged assault in London in June.
The arrest arose from an incident outside a London nightclub in March and resulted in a caution for common assault.
She flew into the US from Australia on Sunday to attend Tuesday's announcement of the award nominations in Las Vegas.
An MTV spokesperson has confirmed the star will still attend the awards show.
"Lily was questioned and her work visa was revoked," Allen's spokesman said. "She was detained for five hours but not strip searched. Understandably she was upset by it."
Allen will need a new work visa before she returns to the US on 6 September, when she is due to play in San Diego.
In a statement the singer said: "I am trying everything I can to sort this out.
"It is my intention to play my American dates in September. This depends on the authorities granting me a new work visa.
"I want my fans to know that I will do everything I can to be back in America in September. I don't like letting my fans down and this is a situation that I am sure we can sort."
Allen's previous stay in the US was cut short when she postponed 20 dates from her tour in May and June because she was "bored slightly" and wanted to get back to work in the studio.
Pop star Lily Allen has had her US work visa cancelled after arriving at Los Angeles International Airport.
The 22-year-old, who is due to tour America in September, had flown in for the MTV Video Music Awards launch.
A spokesman for the singer said: "She's still in America. All her commitments will carry on as normal. The work visa will be sorted out by her next visit."
She was held at the airport for five hours in connection with an arrest for an alleged assault in London in June.
The arrest arose from an incident outside a London nightclub in March and resulted in a caution for common assault.
She flew into the US from Australia on Sunday to attend Tuesday's announcement of the award nominations in Las Vegas.
An MTV spokesperson has confirmed the star will still attend the awards show.
"Lily was questioned and her work visa was revoked," Allen's spokesman said. "She was detained for five hours but not strip searched. Understandably she was upset by it."
Allen will need a new work visa before she returns to the US on 6 September, when she is due to play in San Diego.
In a statement the singer said: "I am trying everything I can to sort this out.
"It is my intention to play my American dates in September. This depends on the authorities granting me a new work visa.
"I want my fans to know that I will do everything I can to be back in America in September. I don't like letting my fans down and this is a situation that I am sure we can sort."
Allen's previous stay in the US was cut short when she postponed 20 dates from her tour in May and June because she was "bored slightly" and wanted to get back to work in the studio.
girlfriend cute Valentine#39;s Day gifts
djmaddy
03-24 10:03 PM
Nice pencils! Is this graphite?!
hairstyles day want est valentines
mrajatish
08-08 12:33 PM
On a different note, how many labor applications does each one of the applicants in BEC have? Among the 250,000 applications still pending in BEC, how many are applications that still have a legitimate benefactor? For example, in your case, it is pretty evident that you are likely going to use the other company's labor, but what happens to the labor you filed from your current company? If this labor is used for sub, then thee is another legitimate applicant who is being denied the opportunity to file 485 by some one who will use this date.
I think this issue is equally important in solving retrogression.
I think this issue is equally important in solving retrogression.
vivek_k
05-07 03:25 PM
Thanks guys. I would appreciate to know if the nationally known attorneys like Rajiv Khanna, Murthy, Ron, Shustermann are actually worth the money they charge?
sertasheep
10-15 09:08 PM
Dear IV Members,
Plans for Next Call
As I draft this post, we are working on the specifics of organizing the next call. We intend to have the call next friday, 20 Oct 2006, and are awaiting confirmation. Please watch out for more information on the forums in the next couple of days.
Range of questions for the upcoming call
At this time, the list of questions has been frozen for the next call. The range of accepted questions is between 71 and 100. This post is being communicated so that members can plan to be present for any follow-up questions they may request the attorney in real-time
Questions not accepted by the attorney
Questions with the following IDs were not accepted by the attorney for the upcoming call: 87, 91, 95, 99
Why was my question not taken up?
The following is a list of probable reasons why certain questions may not have been accepted. This list, is of course, not exhaustive.
- too complicated for a call requiring further discussion or research
- lack of clarity in the law on specific situations
- incomplete
- too generic
- frivioulous
- no previous incidence that the attorney can draw upon without significant research(new situation)
Sending us your questions
We also request members to not send emails from corporate email accounts. It is IV's policy to refrain as much as possible from sending email to members that may constitute as spam.
While we do not want to spam you, there might be exceptional situations wherein we may need to alert you of last-minute changes, and corporate email accounts might consider such alerts(if at all, any) as spam and may hence be filtered.
Keep 'em coming
Lastly, do not let a rejected question deter you from sending in new questions. We encourage you to keep sending in your questions so that we can leverage the attorney's pro bono service.
Enhancing and streamlining the conf. call process
We realize that certain questions may be time-sensitive, and may no longer be relevant when we finalize on a conference call date. Please bear with us as we streamline the process and make our response times better.
Thank you
Plans for Next Call
As I draft this post, we are working on the specifics of organizing the next call. We intend to have the call next friday, 20 Oct 2006, and are awaiting confirmation. Please watch out for more information on the forums in the next couple of days.
Range of questions for the upcoming call
At this time, the list of questions has been frozen for the next call. The range of accepted questions is between 71 and 100. This post is being communicated so that members can plan to be present for any follow-up questions they may request the attorney in real-time
Questions not accepted by the attorney
Questions with the following IDs were not accepted by the attorney for the upcoming call: 87, 91, 95, 99
Why was my question not taken up?
The following is a list of probable reasons why certain questions may not have been accepted. This list, is of course, not exhaustive.
- too complicated for a call requiring further discussion or research
- lack of clarity in the law on specific situations
- incomplete
- too generic
- frivioulous
- no previous incidence that the attorney can draw upon without significant research(new situation)
Sending us your questions
We also request members to not send emails from corporate email accounts. It is IV's policy to refrain as much as possible from sending email to members that may constitute as spam.
While we do not want to spam you, there might be exceptional situations wherein we may need to alert you of last-minute changes, and corporate email accounts might consider such alerts(if at all, any) as spam and may hence be filtered.
Keep 'em coming
Lastly, do not let a rejected question deter you from sending in new questions. We encourage you to keep sending in your questions so that we can leverage the attorney's pro bono service.
Enhancing and streamlining the conf. call process
We realize that certain questions may be time-sensitive, and may no longer be relevant when we finalize on a conference call date. Please bear with us as we streamline the process and make our response times better.
Thank you
No comments:
Post a Comment